News
02nd Nov 2025
Mr. Admin
Children Suffering by Crimes Increases
Alarming data has emerged from National Crime Records Bureau , as 9.2% increase in nationwide crimes against children. Comparing data…
Read More
Alarming data has emerged from National Crime Records Bureau , as 9.2% increase in nationwide crimes against children. Comparing data of one year since 2022 till 2023, Telangana reports highest count of cases of 1,83,644 cases recorded under IPC and special laws, contributing 2.9 % of total national crimes volution. In a population of 1 lakh children, 39.9 children suffer crimes. The state topping on Crime Against Children is Uttar Pradesh contributing a total 12.7% of the crimes against children.
10th Jun 2025
Mr. Admin
FIR Quashing Report
FIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FIR PROCESS in INDIA FIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT…
Read More
FIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FIR PROCESS in INDIAFIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FIR PROCESS in INDIAFIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FIR PROCESS in INDIAFIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FIR PROCESS in INDIAFIR QUASHING BY HC QUASHING IS IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF FIR PROCESS in INDIA
10th Jun 2025
Mr. Admin
FIR Quashing Report
SC has quashed the FIR naming the additional accused in BMC Mining and Minerals fraud case.
Read More
SC has quashed the FIR naming the additional accused in BMC Mining and Minerals fraud case.
19th Jul 2024
Mr. Admin
DELHI HIGHCOURT DEFINES DUTIES OF LITIGANT
The Delhi High Court clarifies the duties of litigants and lawyers in court cases, emphasizing the importance of diligence and…
Read More
The Delhi High Court clarifies the duties of litigants and lawyers in court cases, emphasizing the importance of diligence and responsibility.The court has said that it's the duty of litigants to diligently pursue their case and not solely rely on their lawyers. In a recent case, the court was not convinced by the litigant's claim that his lawyer alleged negligence in the case was the ground for delay. According to the litigant, his lawyer was negligent in pursuing the case- which pertained to the matter of eligibility of the litigant to government post.The court rejected the excuse given by the litigant, that he engaged to file a challenge in High Court, and he interacted with lawyer over phone several times, but his lawyer gave false information. But in August 2024 he found out that his case was never filed in HC.


